
e-ISSN: 2576-0971. October-December Vol. 6 - 4 - 2022 . http://journalbusinesses.com/index.php/revista
51
Organic Law of Citizen Participation and Social Control (2010), the Organic Code of
Planning and Public Finance (2010) and the Organic Code of Territorial Organization,
Autonomy and Decentralization (2011) protect, promote and recognize citizen
participation as a right. However, in the formulation, implementation, control and
monitoring of public policies aimed at the fulfillment of the rights of Good Living, citizen
participation is scarce and incipient (Rojas, 2010; Paltan, 2013). Consequently, it is
questionable due to its ineffectiveness in achieving results in favor of citizens who do not
participate proactively in public policy decision-making in Ecuador's decentralized
autonomous governments. As a result of this situation, agreements on public policies
continue to be led by popularly elected authorities. Under these considerations, with
the purpose of identifying the possible causes that originate a deficient citizen
participation in the representatives of the civil society (Marco Ramiro Torres L., I Mónica
Rocío Mosquera, II Mario Padilla, II, 2017)..
"Citizen participation is primarily a right of citizens, individually and collectively, to
participate (be part of, influence) in a leading role in decision-making, planning and
management of public affairs, and in the popular control of State institutions and society,
and their representatives, in a permanent process of building citizen power" (CPCCS,
2020).
The participation of citizens in public affairs dates back to Greek society. Thus Aristotle,
when referring to the presence of the citizen of the city pointed out that man was a
political animal in the same way St. Thomas Aquinas interpreting this concept
complements that the citizen is a political and social animal (Patiño, 2017).
Therefore, it is opportune to rethink that the existing legal regulations on citizen
participation in Ecuador are not sufficient, and it is necessary to look for other options,
such as developing certain competencies for citizen participation in the main
representatives of civil society organizations, as is the case of neighborhood leaders, who
are more aware of the problems, needs, strengths and weaknesses of the city's
neighborhoods. In this sense, the work carried out by neighborhood leaders in the
processes of citizen participation is evaluated as a fundamental axis in the actions of local
governments. In the literature on the subject, there are several positions that value the
participation of neighborhood leaders in community development processes, the
diagnosis of their problems, participation in decision-making bodies and the development
and evaluation of public policies (Rojas, 2010; Pagani, 2012 and Paltan, 2013).
The lack of empowerment of citizen participation in Canton Quevedo and lack of public
policy, has meant that there is no real citizen action that is a true auditor of public
resources of the Municipality, therefore, the current management model of the
Municipality is a failure, at present the works, budget approval, prioritization of the work,
are not taken into account the citizenship, they do it unilaterally causing an illegality and
illegitimacy to the processes of managing resources with transparency.